🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," said one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to mimic this example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from these regions, other nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this global conversation continues, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that states internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.